Clintonian thought

OK, higher thought about the Clintonian outburst. This is where we differentiate ourselves to the rest of the world, with the potential that we learn from what happened and apply it going forward.

But before I get into that ... I am wondering if the folks in this country kind of look at this and have the "gut-wrench" response I had. We all know Clinton is a liar, and a scoundrel ... that is not what I am talking about. It is the deja vu thing ... that ugly little finger of his that he shook in our face once before.

Remember ... this jerk is the smartest guy in the world, greatest president of all time ... yada yada yada. Can you not imagine that somebody, sometime told him to never, EVER, wag his finger again ... simply because it is one of the defining moments in his presidency?

OK ... but let us get back to the substance of this.

As we go around and around on this subject, there are some things that everybody in the world seems to agree on ... that our on-the-ground intelligence was severely lacking in this situation. If you buy the Clinton line ... he was "trying real hard" to kill / capture bin Laden. OK ... we all know what total B.S. that is, but for the sake of argument let us grant that for the moment ... if he was in fact trying real hard and being generally thwarted by poor intelligence, then what did this AWESOME leader do to improve things? What actions did he take to improve intelligence?

What changes did he make abroad or at home to :
a) get more people on the ground?
b) turn far more attention on figuring out what bin Laden was up to?
c) removing barriers AT HOME to finding his minions on our shores?
d) catching and interrogating the terrorists?

Get it? I mean ... if he was all intense as he claims, you would think he would have moved mountains (and Monica) to get through the barriers, right?

And I mean if he was serious ... and since his foreign policy was so perfect ... all of our wonderful friends that loved us to death (until, of course, George W took office and got all arrogant) would have bent over backwards to help him, right?

The bottom line, as we all are fully aware ... is that his arguments are total bullcrap, he did not give a damn about bin Laden. Now, to be fair ... I want to restate my position on the matter that I do not necessarily blame anybody in context ... neither Clinton nor Bush saw it coming and ignored perfectly good clues that it was coming (again, 20-20 hindsight).

And I say this as somebody who, during the 2000 campaign, accurately predicted that something like 9-11 was coming ... alhtough I thought it would be bigger / perhaps nuclear.

My objection is not so much that Clinton did not do anything ... we knew all along that he accomplished absolutely nothing his entire presidency ... but that now he is saying that he tried to do something.

Oh, and one other thing of "higher" value ... you will once again notice the "liberal" lunacy herein ... in his little finger wagging tirade, the Schlickmeister talked about what he "tried" to do, and that he had gotten closer than anybody ... like this was some kind of accomplishment!!! THAT is the definition of modern progressive / liberal mindset ... that you actually get credit for TRYING, not DOING.

No, you arrogant ass (er, Mr. Arrogant Ass) ... you don't get credit for "trying" when 3000 people die as a result. Never mind that you are lying about it now.


Going forward, this has to be the message the Republicans drive home. Why? Because it advances the conservative agenda, and is IMPOSSIBLE for liberals to defend against ... even the "cut and run" strategy will be EXTREMELY heavily dependent (more so than "kill all the bad guys") on knowing what is going on. It can look backward and forward :

"Bill Clinton said he 'tried', but what did he do to improve his chances? Nothing ... because democraps don't think about fighting our enemies to defeat them"

"We cannot afford to let the party that put us in this incredibly weak position by decimating our intelligence, to get back into power"

Silencing dissent

If you cruise around leftie web sites or listen to their mallarky, inevitably you will hear one of the goofs comment on how the Bush administration is "suppressing dissent". I might guess that the origin of this stupidity is the Queen herself ... one of Hillary's whines about how democraps were being ignored by the "Plantation" republicans. Note to Hillary ... if you actually said something worth discussing, you would not be ignored. But I digress ...

It is absolutely hillarious that a liberal is so incredibly blind as to broadcast this assertion on the internet ... they literally do not sense how hypocritical they are ... a piss-ant worthless dweeb that could easily fall off thee face of the earth without notice, going on a forum that has international access, broadcasting their worthless and generally unsubstantiated claims and accusations for all (who don't have a life) to see ... but they are being suppressed by the big, bad Republicans!!!

It really boggles the mind.

I have no idear why I thought of that when thinking about Flipper Kerry, on the floor of the Senate today in the discussion of the bill which (hopefully) sets up the guidelines for the handling of terrorists. I mean ... here you have an idiot that bemoans the inability to do very thing that he is doing right there on the floor of the senate ... for everybody in the world to see and hear ... much to the glee of the terrorists.

When thinking of Kerry, I am also reminded of the fact that this worthless traitor ... a guy who basically sat around the Senate for how many years and amounted to ?what? in terms of legislation ... commendations for somebody who blew the world's biggest fart or something like that ... that this loser was a key figure in snatching the inevitable victory in Vietnam and handing it to the VietCong, resulting in the brutal murders of millions of people. This time around, if he is successful as a traitor for a second time ... it will be millions of Americans slaughtered. The WORLD needs to stop Kerry from reaching a place of high honor in the Bin Laden hall of fame, next to his place of high honor in the Vietcong hall of fame. At least bin Laden will have Kerry's head in the window, so that John boy might not have the opportunity to be a hero to yet another murderous regime for a third time. I digress again ...

During his whine today ... another "higher" thought came to my mind. Kerry mentioned something about "America's moral authority" ... and how it would be somehow "further" undermined if we OK this bill, in a manner similar to how our moral authority was lost in the Iraq situation.

And I got to thinking ... here is a "higher" set of thoughts here ... something that Kerry is incapable of. What exactly was the "higher" moral value leading up the the war in Iraq??? Contemplate that for a minute ... what was the position of strength, of high values, of justice? And who were the useless and worthless dirtballs at the low end of the "moral authority" ladder ... the bozos that would not accept reality, that were lining their pockets with Saddam's gold ... who stood idly by while Saddam built castles but the children of Iraq died, the chemical attacks, etc.

The Bush administration probably did screw up some things in Iraq ... heck 20-20 hindsight should be perfect, right (OK ... if you are conservative ... liberals hindsight is sometimes more of a joke then their foresight). Nothing, however, changes the fact that the scum of the earth in this situation, perhaps a half step BELOW Saddam himself, is the leftie socialists and their regime in the UN.

Who has the high moral ground here??? Kerry's world of delusion is one where Cuba would be an armed powerhouse and all the Caribean islands under Fidel's (and now his evil twins') control ... with lots of missiles pointed at us. USSR would still be alive and kicking. The US would be paying TRILLION$$$ to third world dictators in the Algore "Money for greenhouse gases" lottery. And the US would be subservient to the UN.

I thought the terrorist angle and imminent threat argument against Saddam was a really stupid approach for Bush. We needed to go in there exclusively by saying that we are not putting up with Saddam's crap anymore, period. The fact that Kerry cannot determine how THAT was the moral position is not only foolish, but combined with his position and message and willingness to turn on his own is DANGEROUS for the U.S.

50 questions from a liberal jerk

Hey ... you'll love this ... somehow got routed to a site with these questions from a guy named Robert J. Elisberg ... liberals are supposed to ask conservatives.

Two points: Elisberg makes some crack about "talking points", I am ALWAYS fascinated when a liberal brings up talking points ... gravitas ... because, liberals are total idiots about talking points : the DNC issues them ... Blood for oil ... and the mindless liberal robots parrot the phrases word for word ... Frat boy ... many times either not knowing the definition of the word or the proper context ... neocon ... and therefore when they use the phrase it invariably is used wrong ... chicken hawk ... and the liberal ends up looking like a total fool to whomever they talk to who has a brain (other liberals think they are brilliant, of course) ... Haliburton ... The latest incarnation of this was "jujitzu", which nobody understood, and the comments by the politicos themselves (not just the liberal minions) were as dumb as anything I've heard out of these clowns.

Second, most of these questions are ridiculously simple to answer ... not even with right leaning spin ... but just straight up. There are combos like "you agree with 'taking responsibility' " and followed up with "why are Republicans not taking responsibility for the state of affairs". Oooo ... they tricked us into admitting that we are responsible for what is arguably the best state of the economy, perhaps of all time. Bummer. Out-n-out lies like the "covert agent" scandal ... which we now know was a clumsy smear job by Democrat hacks (I know ... redundant) ... allowing easy trashing of the premise.

But let us get to the fun:

1. What are the Top Seven best things that the Bush Administration has done?
I can only list seven???
(note: answers not necessarily in order)
Tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts (I think there were at least three sets)
Killed thousands / 10s of thousands of really bad guys (does that only count as one?) and locked up a bunch more in Gitmo
Unseated Saddam Hussein, killed his sons
John Roberts , Sam Alito , Janice Rogers Brown
No attacks in America have been successful since 9-11
Osama is a scared little rat, cowering under a rock
Increases in Republican majority (how long has it been since that happened)?
Recovered from Clinton economic disaster, 9-11, stock crash, worst hurricane season ever, etc.

2. Is the Iraq War is going well?

Have not been there ... have you? All the soldiers I have talked to and most I have heard say absolutely. And they are sick of know-nothing liberal wanna-be-losers saying otherwise.

3. After three years thus far, when do you think Iraq might be able to "stand up" so that America can "stand down"?

Ask Japan, Germany, Bosnia, Philipines, etc. etc. etc. They might be able to help you with a timeline since they are still on theirs. Besides ... we have not killed all the bad guys yet ... since liberals are idiots they do not seem to understand that we don't leave a fight until all the bad guys are dead.

4. For his part in the event, how would you rate the job the President did protecting New Orleans from devastation?

Wasn't his job to protect ... billions have been pocketed by corrupt democrats that was supposed to improve protection ... his job was to be in a position to support local / state officials. FEMA did that well, although they did not respond fast enough after they figured out the mayor and governor (Democrats) were idiots.

5. How do you think the rebuilding of New Orleans is going?

Fair to midland, considering the difficulty of the owners not returning. What would liberal whining hypocrits be saying if the Feds just confiscated all the land and gave it to redevelopers? Besides, has anybody figured out how to locate a major city in a swamp that is sinking so that it WON'T HAPPEN AGAIN? And how fast are things going to go when the idiots in that town elect the same derelict liberal "chocolate"-for-brains moron that caused a disaster in the first place

6. When Dick Cheney and the oil company and energy executives met in private to plan America's energy policy, how much of their goal was to benefit consumers?

Same amount as when radical left kook enviro-terrorists get together to plan forest usage, saving some rare cockroach, or preserving Oprah Winfrey's lakeside view. Or when Hillary got together with Schlick's big contributors to federalize 1/6th of the US economy . Seriously though, in reality, they were one helluva lot more concerned about folks then Herr Hillary.

7. Do you believe in the President's call for an Era of Personal Responsibility?

Absolutely ... as do most Americans, including the losers that practice irresponsibility. Just because they cash in on liberal fruitcake ideas does not mean they don't know right from wrong.

8. Since Republicans control the White House, Senate and House of Representatives, how personally responsible are they for conditions in America today?

Seems like they are striking up the bands and leading the parade ... the economy is roaring, gas prices are plummeting, interest rates are stable, life is improving across the board, etc. etc. etc.
Only the hate-Bush crowd is seeing the grey cloud in the golden lining. The fact that the Republicans discount the lies perpetuated by lefties is not "ducking responsibility" ... it is simply pointing out that liberals are liars and fools.

9. Why do you think they haven't been able to find anyone who can verify that George Bush ever showed up for National Guard duty in Alabama?

Because nobody but a bunch of whining idiots care, and even many of the crybabies are careful enough to not be seen openly whining in public. Let's cut to the chase, there brain surgeon ... let's see a dumb ass liberal ... how 'bout Clinton, Kerry, or wedge Fat-Drunk Teddy into a fighter jet and pilot it onto a ship. And when they fish their butt out of the drink, we might have a better idea of how much GW had to master while he was in.

10. Would you want Donald Rumsfeld to plan your daughter's wedding?

Hell no ... he is too busy planning what will probably go down in history as one of the best military victories of all time.

11. Are you aware that no government in the history of civilization, other than the Bush Administration, has lowered taxes during a war?

Um ... I realize that liberals are arrogant jerks, or at least presume that they are smart while all their liberal friends are idiots ... so a question like this goes unchallenged in the echo chamber of derelicts. They are so arrogant as to believe that Conservatives don't know that the law was enacted before 9-11 ... and THANK GOD!

12. Are you married?

Yup

13. Do you personally feel threatened by gay marriage?

Of course not ... "things" cannot threaten me, idiots can. And the idiots that want to flip societal norms on its head to justify their perversion are absolutely a threat, especially to my kids (and by extension, myself).

14. Since getting elected, do you think the President has been more a uniter or a divider?

Much to my chagrin, a uniter. He bends over backwards extending a hand of friendship to worthless manure (Democrat) that do not deserve it. Let me ask you something there brainless ... how many does it take to tango? Oh, and one more important assignment for you ... ask a professional dancer what happens when the female (who is supposed to follow the lead) tries to lead when it is not her place? (I know ... they'll be too stupid to figure out what I mean, but they might know a conservative that can explain it to them)

15. How do you explain the President's approval rating going from a high of 90% to the current mid-30%?

95% of the people doing the reporting are left wing jerks who are willing to lie through their slimey white teeth to denigrate the president. After 6 years, even total b.s. takes its toll.


16. Do you like the government collecting personal data on you without a warrant?

You know ... Clinton is out of office ... do we really have to rehash his criminal history again?

17. How much money do you have in your bank account, stocks and investments?

100s of thousands ... thanks for asking!

18. What's your partner's favorite sex position?

My partner doesn't like sex ... I'm married for crying out loud! (couldn't resist ;-)

19. If you have nothing to hide, why aren't you answering?

I did answer. But even if I didn't ... the NSA having the answer to those questions would not help tehm figure out if I was a terrorist ... so if they are concerned with sexual positions, we need to wonder what the hell they are up to. That is why the NSA is not concerned with stupid things like this, although obviously liberals who think like Bill Clinton would be.

20. Should we build a wall along the Mexican border?

Yup

21. Why isn't anyone building a wall along the Canadian border?

Last I checked, we don't have 10's of millions of uneducated poor Canadians streaming across the border trying to have their babies born here so that they can hitch a free ride on our social welfare systems. Even in northern states ... it is the illegal Mexicans that are bankrupting the hospitals, not the Canadians.

Unlike most liberal programs ... "anyone" with a brain would actually like to fix the problem, not just pretend like they are fixing the problem.

22. Does that terrorist gang arrested in Canada count as a threat?

To Canada, I suppose.

23. If you shot someone in the face while drinking, how fast would the police show up to arrest you?

Not nearly as fast as the police that were onsite with the VP. And since those police were witnesses to the event and realized it was an accident, the point is moot.

24. If Donald Rumsfeld had planned your daughter's wedding three years ago, would the guests still be there?

Told you ... Don Rumsfeld is too busy doing a fantastic job as DOD Secretary ... no time for wedding planning. But as long as we're on the subject, could you ask FDR's / Truman's war council when the hell we can get out of the occupied countries?


25. Even if no laws are broken, do you think it's okay to reveal the name of a covert agent?

Nope. But a mindless, non-covert pencil pusher who positions her equally mindlessly stupid husband to do a job gathering intelligence about nuclear bombs, that he has absolutely no qualifications for ... and that idiot then comes back and publicly lies through his teeth about what he could not find if it was hidden in his pants ... and then people begin to openly wonder how somebody this stupid and dishonest could have been positioned this way ... THAT is OK to reveal.

Funny how this whole story just blew up in liberals' faces huh? Every pile of dog doo-doo, liberal idiots just step right in. Isn't it strange that the "covert" agent turned out to be a left wing radical freak, sticking their incompetent, lying, and boneheaded spouse in the middle of an important intelligence gathering operation. Hey, those lefties are SERIOUS about national security, eh?


26. During your lifetime, approximately how often have you changed your mind?

Stupid stuff ... often. Core convictions ... not much

27. Why shouldn't people dismiss you as a flip-flopper?

Because I don't pander to a bunch of flim-flam idiots with my core-convictions. And the decisions that I changed my mind on were not international in scale, where the new decision could get 1000s or 10s of thousands of people (soldiers and citizens alike) slaughtered and have reverberations for decades.

28. Where do you think the Weapons of Mass Destruction might be?

Well, the 500+ shells we found are being disposed of ... but if you don't think they are *really* bad ... we can just pour the juice in your garden! The parts of the nuclear stuff were / are buried in the yards of the scientists, a bunch of stuff is buried in the 1000s of square miles of desert. Oh, and the pilots that flew them to Syria said some are there as well. And I doubt too many famers who eat their own crops are irrrigating their crops with the water from the Euphrates. And the fertilizer trailers I'll bet are actually being used for ... fertilizer!!!

29. Where do you think Osama bin Laden might be?

In Pakistan where he knew he would be safe because the tribal chiefs are helping him to hide, and our going in might cause a revolution to a more radical element that will then be in command of known functional nuclear weapons and long range missiles.

So ... ignorant and arrogant liberal jerk ... tell me how you would go and get him out of there?


30. Is it fiscally responsible to cut taxes, increase spending and create a $9 trillion federal debt?

Nope ... sure am glad that's not what happened. But hey ... let's sit down and I promise you I (hard core conservative) can eliminate about 2-3 trillion in about 5 minutes and have us out of debt in 5 years ... ready??? Hey ... where are you going?

31. Are you glad liberals passed such programs as Social Security, Medicare, the Civil Rights Act, women's suffrage, federal deposit insurance, unemployment compensation, rural electrification, child labor laws, minimum wages and the 40-hour work week?

Well ... lets see ... Social Security ... going bankrupt, Medicare ... rampant fraud and going bankrupt, FDIC covers some stuff but the vast majority of the mediocre amount Americans save is not covered by (eligible for) FDIC, unemployment compensation ... lowers wages for the poor, rural electrification ... would have happened either way (look at cable), child laber laws ... did not like them much when I was a kid and needed money ... minimum wages are not applicable in a real economy ... 40 hr work week ... who the hell you know has a 40 hour work week?

Civil rights act ... actually, a conservative bill, since Republicans voted for it in significantly greater percentages than liberals.

Woman's suffrage ... WAY TOO TEMPTING!!! ;-)


32. What are the Top Ten best things that conservatives have given to America?

Umm ... OK ... number one is (or should be) teaching them that the freakin' government is NOT SUPPOSED TO GIVE ANYTHING TO AMERICA ... in fact CANNOT give anything to America ... the government only TAKES FROM AMERICA one helluva lot more than it gives back.

- Republicans (can't say conservatives or not ... definitions have all changed) freed the slaves
- defeated USSR
- all the stuff in number 1.
- preserved the constitution AND seperation of powers



33. If you were on life support, would you want a doctor you'd never met making a diagnosis about you via remote television?

Sure ... if the best doctor available only had that kind of access. But I sure the hell would not want Hillary deciding who the doctor would be ...

34. Do you think man-made greenhouse gases have anything at all to do with depleting the ozone layer?

Could be, some cause problems in a test-tube, but natural phenomena have way too many variables to determine the exact cause. Besides, the ozone has been fluctuating since the beginning of time, and the worst place for it (South pole) is the place with the least amount of humans. Nonetheless, releasing poisons into the air is stupid.

35. If Donald Rumsfeld had planned your daughter's wedding three years ago, and guests were still there, how many factions would they now be split into?

Have you ever been to a wedding? I have not been to one where there were not factions. But since liberals are morons ... lets cut to the chase ... factions were in Iraq long before Donald Rumsfeld was born, and they were slaughtering each other since the beginning of time, even before there was oil.

Now, given this ... is it a good idea that liberals in the US are trying so hard to break up everybody into "factions"???

36. How good is it that the terrorist Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi was killed?

Awesome baby

37. Are you aware that in 2002 the Pentagon knew where al-Zarqawi was and presented three separate plans to kill him, but the Administration refused to act each time?

Probably ... just as the Administration knew dozens of times where Osama was but the Administration refused to act each time ... but that would be Clinton. Last I checked, Osama caused a slightly bigger problem on our land than did Abu.


38. Is George W. Bush the kind of guy you'd want to sit down and have a beer with?

No ... he does not drink and neither do I. But I'll definitely share a lemonade with him.

39. When he started talking about being a Born Again Christian, would you want to stay or leave?

I'd share my story and ask him his. We would probably pray together, maybe even sing a hymn ... how cool would that be!!! Libs can join in as well ... were not biased.

40. Is Ray Romano the kind of guy you'd want to sit down and have a beer with?

Don't know who ray is ... but if he's from Hollywood, not likely.

41. Would you want him to be President?

See 40. If Ray is hard core conservative ... maybe.

42. Does the Administration have an environmental policy that benefits the environment?

Hope not ... we need one that benefits HUMANS ... which includes sustainable preservation.

43. Since George Bush campaigned for President strongly against nation building, in what ways are our actions in Iraq not nation building?

You might have heard of this thing called 9-11 ... 3000 people died and the largest buildings in America, including the Pentagon, were attacked. We decided to go kill bad guys, and now we have a steady stream of bad guys that we just keep killing ... but over there.

When the bad guy queue runs out ... chances are that nobody will want to (or need to) stick around ... unless it makes sense like in Germany, Japan, etc. etc. etc.

44. What's the maximum amount of time you'd want to spend alone with Dick Cheney?

As long as he is willing to give me.

45. After dismissing Saddam Hussein's old Iraqi army, was it a good idea to let them keep their rifles?

"Dismissing"? Um ... they disappeared into the population during the invasion. We could have just killed all the civilians ... I am sure the whacky liberals would have supported that. We could ask them to stand up (to be shot) ... that would have gone over well.

Regardless ... in case liberals have not really been paying attention ... the rifles have been about the least of our worries. Any fool that actually faces American soldiers with a rifle is not long for this world.

46. Would a policy that allows torture be something that makes you proud as an American?

No, it would be something that makes me ALIVE as an American.

Unlike a policy that allows the President to bag women in the back offices of the White House, which also did not make me proud as an American but arguably resulted in the deaths of thousands of Americans.

I also am not proud that we have to lock up hundreds of murderers, rapists, child molesters, etc ... but I am damn glad they do.

47. Has the Mission been Accomplished?

Saddam is locked up writing poetry, his boys are ant food, and his scuds, tanks, centrifuges, chemical plants, bioterror labs, etc. are disabled. I think our flyboys did their end of it.

48. Do you feel comforted that Dick Cheney is a heartbeat away from being President?

Awesome baby!!! I am hard pressed to think of anybody I would rather have at this time backing up the president.

And I am much more comforted that the heartbeat of the president is not in the chest of Algore or John Kerry.

49. If Donald Rumsfeld had planned your daughter's wedding, and guests started fighting and were killed, would you expect to be allowed to view the caskets when they were returned home?

No ... I would hope somebody would have the taste and good sense to stop me if I was planning on taking pictures to desecrate their sacrifices, shame their families, destroy their reputations, and desecrate the mission that they believed in, fought for and died for.

Liberals would not understand because they are ashamed of themselves, have no sense of honor and country, are not just unpatriotic but ANTI-patriotic ... and really should consider moving to France to be among their own.

50. How glad do you think George Bush is that he's no longer active in the National Guard?

He is the commander in chief ... one helluva promotion, eh?

Is this a great country or what?

The UN is unequivocal proof that the US is the greatest country in history.

"Huh??? What the heck has RMW been smoking???"

Yes ... and so is France and the rest of the Eurotrash (proof of our greatness, not great themselves) ... and to a large extent the terrorists and the nations that harbor them, etc. Cuba ... that is like a great big exclamation point ... perhaps two or three!!!

"OK ... now you have really lost your mind"

Nope ... all of these things are a tribute to the greatness of this country. We are by far the most powerful force on the planet. Nobody doubts for one second that we could simply and efficiently annihilate everything that is giving us a problem right now, with the possible exception of China (I think we could wipe out China too ... but they have not really been that big of a pain in the butt).

Higher thought ... would you really be this pissed off at all of this crap if we could not? Get it? I never got this worked up over the USSR, and they were orders of magnitude a greater *real* threat to us as any of these third rate tyrants.

And we let them exist. In the last two days ... and by the way most of you missed this unless you paid close attention ... the two poster boys for insignificant deranged thugs that think they are far more important than they are ... openly advocated 1) the end of the world and 2) the end of the US ... in speeches for all to see, on OUR OWN DIRT.

Fascinating side note ... somebody doing something similar to them on their own dirt would not survive an hour; diplomatic b.s. aside.

The bottom line is our own confidence in how great we are, so while we may at best get pissed off or at worst whine like liberals about how "inappropriate" it is ... we tolerate this kind of lunacy the way a parent tolerates a toddler throwing a spaz attack.

"OK ... so what about France and the like? How does that prove anything?"

It proves that despite their total bullshit, the French know, or at least strongly believe, that the US will bail their worthless, treacherous butts out of any bind they get themselves into. They're like the cocky spoiled rich bitch that gets into all sorts of trouble knowing that "daddy" will always be there to bail them out. And it is likely we will ... that is part of being great.

As an aside ... I have this "fantasy" that I allow myself to engage in ... that those I oppose would someday, someway, be allowed to actually face a world in which they were successful in getting their own way. For instance ... the Democraps getting their heads chopped off in the streets of America after the terrorists defeat us (don't want GW listening in, now do we?). French women being gang raped by the lunatic horndog muslim men ... then once they are used up being forced to live as slaves under their burkas. Hillary forced to undergo abortions day in and day out ... sadistic I admit. Robert KKK Byrd at the end of Lindy's doggie leash!!! Ted Kennedy dropped into the ocean in a car.


So let not your heart be troubled ... when you feel that anger well up inside you, just remember that we *really* could wipe these clowns off of the face of the planet, and there is not thing one anybody could do to stop us. Have the quiet comfort of know who really is the world's greatest power and why.

Rapid Fire

Ok ... lots of stuff happening ... so here is some rapid fire stuff

Taliban at a funeral

Having a hard time watching all of the coverage of the missed opportunity to kill around 200 taliban (because apparently the rules of engagement do not allow an attack on a funeral procession). So who is asking the "higher" questions???

Where did this stupid "rule" come from? And did it apply to civilian combatants or military personnel only?

NOTE: that last part is INCREDIBLY critical. And I will get back to it in a minute.

More importantly ... can we at least agree that the non-stop, viscious attacks at the flank of our military by the left wing in this country has played a significant role in castrating the military (particularly that which results in decision making like this)? Ignoring the fact that many of the most heinous accusations from the Democrap goons turned out to be totally bogus, and that terrorist playbooks specifically tell insurgents to fabricate bogus accusations especially to the leftie media ... you cannot ignore that the military MUST be impacted by what is going on in Washington and therefore situations like this likely happen every day.

At the surface it may seem insane ... and we might blame (perhaps rightfully so) military style political correctness. However, with true heros ... American soldiers who put their butts on the line every day ... awaiting trials which could result in the death penalty for their actions in battle, I doubt that I would have the cajones to give an order if I had even the most remote doubt that the Beached Whale, Senator Turban, KKK Byrd or Jack "Stab 'em in the back without a benefit of the doubt" Murtha chomping at the bit to cut my head off ... to hurt Bush by killing me.

Regarding the "civilians" discussion ... think of how completely insane we have gotten with this ... and how perfectly correct I was about the dangerous path we got on by IGNORING GENEVA'S MAIN PREMISE ... that "war" is defined by armies in UNIFORMS. I mean, we have the Supreme Court giving terrorists US citizen rights ... despite the fact that (lucky for us) the nearest any of these viscious terrorists have been to setting foot on US soil is Gitmo in Cuba. As time goes on, it seems like the question of whether or not the guys planting the bombs or doing the "hit-n-runs" have on even something remotely resembling a uniform, nevermind the fact that they are not citizens of whatever country they are attacking us in.


Who are we talking about? And what EXACTLY are you talking about?

A big part of the insanity of the whole debate regarding interrogation is how the leftie kooks, in this case including McClame, Goober, Colin (dog)Pile, etc. ... demogogue the terminology. The terrorists are "detainees" ... which sounds harmless ... like something you might do to a child to protect them from doing something dangerous ... "I detained my toddler to keep him from falling in the water". Why don't we just start calling them honored guests? The techniques to put the terrorists under pressure to respond is "torture" ... hell we must gouge out their eyeballs and pull of their nails and shock their genitals and stuff, right? Um, no, we make them cold or have dogs bark at them or GASP ... make them watch Lindy England having sex (ok ... that last one is pretty gross ... especially if they tell them that their 72 virgins are all going to look like Lindy).

Seriously though ... next time you hear somebody spouting off about "torture" and all that garbage ... make them answer EXACTLY the questions WHO and WHAT? Make them define the what ... so that everybody around them realizes how totally full of crap they are.


I thought Carville was supposed to be some kind of genious

From the "I cannot believe you said something that stupid" file ... pull out James Carville's statement on some show ... basically making fun of the Iraq war by claiming that "If america were attacked by Japan, they would attack Mexico". As an aside ... I heard some English guy quoted with an incredible classic ... saying that the "hate-bush" stuff is now relegated to "The really stupid jokes that only stupid people laugh at".

Um ... no, carville ... you stupid ass ... we attacked Germany. Yes, I know it was a lot more complicated than that, and perhaps Carville was not referencing the second world war. However, even if he did not intend this to be a reference to WW II ... it was a perfect fit for an analogy at the "higher" level of thought.

We attacked Germany because Germany was part of what was going on AGAINST US and our friends. The analogy to Iraq is not perfect, but good enough.

Finally ...

What would a good article be without some Clinton bashing ... bill gertz has a new book out about how our federal government is either intensely incompetent (intelligence wise) or infiltrated with the worst of our enemies. Several examples I heard had to do with the Red Chinese ... great escapes, mass captures, total elimination of all intelligenceassets we may have in their country.

So, now ... think that one through. During the erection elections, Clinton was getting tons of money from the Chinese. A couple of years later, our intelligence is virtually non-existent both in China as well as a lot of places they value (like Iran). Go figure.

The Movie

As an aside ... lately ... I have more or less responded to the stuff going on and really have not done much of the original "promise" ... abstracting day-to-day stuff to the higher level. I'll attend to that in a bit ...

Never mind ... let me hit it right away ... I think we continue down the path where the Democraps believe their own press, and have made what will hopefully be the disasterous decision to show America their true colors ... the latest blunder this time by threatening to cause ABC problems if they aired the 9-11 movie. I am just out of my mind about this one ... how could they be so stupid as to take a public stand that literally threatens a major broadcast company? Worse yet, this is the same party that literally BEGGED people to go to Michael Moore's Crocumentary ... Ferris Bueller's 9-11, and invited the fathead to sit with the worst president of the 20th century during their convention.

Then again, maybe I should not be so surprised.

Another "high" thought ... how do people continue to get sucked into the Clinton self-absorption neurosis. I mean, you've got the whole 2-3 decade old terrorist mess which is not all that much of a mystery to anybody but the deranged few (i.e. typically reserved for faculty at schools like UW Madison and Berkeley) ... effectively boils down to them doing all they can to kill us and us ignoring them, so they just get worse and worse. So we do a movie about it, and Bill Clinton thinks it is all about him. The funny part is that the idiot effectively PROVED the case of the moviemakers by being such an idiot and acting like such a thug.

More fun thoughts ... all of the Clintonoids that crawl out from under whatever rock or sewer they are under to deny the fundamental facts of the movie. Includes Sandy Burglar ... who was guilty of stealing documents from the National Archives trying to cover up the facts during the 9-11 committee, Maddy Half-bright ... whose awesome negotiating skills gave us the North Korea of today, even Richard Clark. That last one is so bizarre because this is the guy that comes off looking like a hero in the movie. Maybe he was just pissed off because the actor that played his part was a lard-ass.


At the end of the movie, ABC took a gratuitous slap at the Bush Administration by showing a graphic that the 9-11 commission gave GW pretty bad grades on security ... and "higher" thought can take us in a bunch of directions on this.
1) Um, let's see ... the commission said that attacks were a matter of "when", not "if" ... and you would have been insane to have predicted we would go 5 years without another. Yet here we are. So whatever Bush is doing HAS worked and the commission recommendations, AS ANTICIPATED BY THE PRESIDENT ... were pretty much useless.
2) Much of the crap recommended WOULD NOT HAVE STOPPED 9-11 ... um, am I missing something here?
3) Jamie Gorelick was on the commission, yet was probably the person single most responsible for making 9-11 happen. At the very least she should have been cooking in the hotseat a helluva lot more than anybody else, and FORCED to answer the question "why the hell would you set this policy to tie your own hands?"
4) The commission totally (and intentionally) ignored several key programs that absolutely identified the ring leader(s) Atta, et al. ... Able danger, etc. We "had" them.


More Random Thoughts

Heard Dick Morris comment on the fact that "we had no president" for a couple of years because of that idiotic Lewinsky garbage. For the record, I have already commented that this may go down as one of the dumbest decisions in the annals of the Federal Judiciary ... allowing a trailer park tramp to sue a sitting president on a personal matter ... and we now know the blood of American citizens was the price we paid.

Nonetheless ... Clinton should have kept Mr. Happy in his pants, and he should not have lied about it ... he ended up settling the damned case anyway ... so what the hell was the point? Morris' conclusions (along the lines of some "our team can do no wrong" whacked out lefties) is barely part of it.

Regardless ... even when he was not running off at the evils of Ken Starr, Schlick never showed any real leadership or vision against terrorism the whole time he was prez ... so pretending like catching hummers from his daughter's girlfriends as the reason he failed is just a sideshow.

News Flash : Gary Hart Finally tells us the Democrat plan to defeat terrorism

Gary Hart gets on the O'Reilly Factor tonight, and in a totally distinguished and contemplative voice ... tells Bill about how the Democrats are going to defeat the terrorists. OK, try not to laugh ... I mean he was serious and sounded OK for about 10 seconds (more to that later) ... basically that the real front in the war on terrorism is Europe, (seriously ... he said "Europe") so the democrat plan is that we're going to get together with the intelligence agencies and special forces (huh?) in those countries to defeat the terrorists in Europe.

Wait ... stop laughing ... seriously it sounded good. OK, OK ... you have to have your head completely up your own ass to be a liberal/Democrap ... we know that:
- all of the terrorists tell each other that the central front is Iraq
- in another breath the Democrats will argue that there are 1000s of terrorists in Iraq (their argument that there are more terrorists in Iraq now than there were under Saddam)
- blah blah blah

OK, but ... wait ... c'mon ... stop laughing ... these guys might win in November and you will have terrorists dancing in the streets of Iraq a few months later ... so listen up ... OK ... the second part is just as funny. So there's this massive "front" in the war on terror in EUROPE! OK ... now ... the democraps and their pals the French are going to thwart their efforts and defeat the terrorists!!!

Yes ... really ... THE BIG, BAD FRENCH ... their *special forces* no less! Oh yeah ... the same French that allowed muslim lunatics to riot for what, like weeks, burning whatever they could night after night after night. Yeah, those French are going to rise up and their SPECIAL FORCES ... no doubt some of whom were funneling US secrets to Saddam, along with materials for nuclear and chemical weapons manufacture ... whose fingerprints are all over the knives in the backs of Powell and Bush ... yep, we'll be a powerful force for good working with those clowns.

Who is next on Gary Hart's "tough guys" list ... probably the Spanish ... right? Another group that stands up in the face of terrorism ... by electing the guys the terrorists want right after an attack. Oh yeah, trust them with my children, that's for sure. You know ... I bet we can probably count on some of those muslims from the Balkans, right? Uh-huh ... they will be behind us all the way! Counting on it.

Allright ... back to the 10 seconds ... so O'Reilly literally cuts the heart out of Hart right then and there ... Oh it was ugly. O'Reilly is like ... so we're going to team up with the French, who's Prime Minister just said that the there is no war on terror?

Awwww, man ... Bill ... that was heartless (pardon the pun) ... I mean here the guy tried to look all diplomatic and intellectual and like, you hit him with a question a 3rd grader could have figured out and make the bozo look like ... um ... well ... a BOZO!

I always get a kick out of Hart regardless ... I mean how can you not just laugh at a jackass who during his presidential run, challenges the press to try to catch him with his philandering, then goes out and starts actually doing it, right? Watching Bill dissect this idiot just reminded me of how absolutely stupid this guy is.

And he is an intellectual amongst the democrats. hee hee hee!

But always remember ... George W Bush, and Dan Quayle, and Ronald Reagan ... THEY are the dumb ones. Har har har.

Commercial - "It is the economy stupid", isn't it?

Another entry in my "political commercials I would love to see" pile:

In the 90s, we were told that the only thing that mattered (in national politics) : "It's the economy, stupid". If the economy is good, and it is all Bill Clinton's doing, we were supposed to elect democrats.

Yeah, right ... now that the Republicans have picked up the pieces left behind by the Clinton/Gore recession mess, all of a sudden we are supposed to totally ignore the economy.

The economy is in the best state it has been in years, including the 90s, despite the best efforts of Democrats and their friends in the media. And statistics show that those benefits are for everybody, from top to bottom.

The tax cuts proposed by Mr. Bush, and passed by a Republican congress has done exactly what we were told they would do ... made the economy better.

Now the democrats are promising to "turn things around", and their friends in the media want to help them. So if you want to go back into a recession, and crank up your taxes, vote Democrat. But if you believe that the message about a fantastic economy still holds, then vote Republican.

Joe Wilson is a liar ... BIG SURPRISE ... Now some important questions

So now the Washington Post finally admits that Joe Wilson is a liar, and the whole Valerie Wilson "outing" was a major scam.

I have got to ask this ... who knew it was all B.S. and when? And are there any laws or constraints against the federal officials involved, particularly Senate Democrats ... for their efforts to smear the Administration. No, obviously democraps lie through their teeth constantly ... that is nothing new. However, they were calling for federal investigations, an independent prosecutor, knowing full well not only that no law was breached, but that nobody from the administration had anything to do with it.

I realize different laws apply to the high-n-mighty as opposed to serfs like us ... if I went to the police and triggered an investigation just to smear somebody ... I would be parking my heiney on a cold bench for some time. But for "The Chuckey" ... hey, no problem ... call for all the investigations in the world.

What about the independent prosecutor? Is there nothing anybody can do for this incredible breach of justice? Apparently that bastard knew early on exactly who it was who "outed" Wilson, not to mention that it did not come within miles of being a violation of any law ... yet he immediately focuses in on the targets of the Democraps' choosing, namely Rove and Libbey, that have absolutely nothing to do with the case.

This stinks to high heaven.

I am sick and tired of Bush (and the Republicans) playing the weakling ... he ought to go for the throats of the Swimmer and Chuckey Schmucky and the rest of those dogs. A *perfect* podium would be a grand speech where he pardons Mr. Libbey, during which he shines the bright spotlight on their little scam. It should include a line like "I am the president, and I should expect the opposing party to come after me ... although the pure brutality we see today is totally out of line. It is sad that the Democrats have brought us to this. But for these guys to knowingly lie to the American people and launch a federal investigation on false pretenses just to hurt my assistants is totally uncalled for and beyond any sense of decency, never mind the damage it does to our democracy. "

In addition, is anybody going to take a hard look at the treacherous enterprise that made Wilson all the rage? How the hell did this useless mass of stupidity become embroiled in world changing events? For crying out loud, how the hell does somebody this stupid rise to the level he did? What the hell is going on with our CIA when a mindless twit like Valerie can make arrangements for her useless husband to go on a trip like this?

Doesn't this scare the hell out of anybody? Who are these people?

I mean ... worthless trash like Sheehan or Jackson or Sharpton or whatever ... they are made infamous by a laughable news media on a 24 hour news cycle ... but their only relevance is in their own minds and the minds of the zombies who are stupid enough to follow them. The Wilsons, on the other hand ... were/are employees of the government at seemingly high levels (I think Joey was some type of ambassador or something, no?) ... at least high enough to be able to get involved in nuclear intelligence gathering.

And then we all wonder why our intelligence is a joke, our reputation around the world is in shambles, and 10th century derelicts are giving us a run for our money?