WMDs, useful or not? That is NOT THE QUESTION!

So we have found several hundreds of shells. Surprise, surprise.

And now we're arguing about potency, viability, etc. Stuff is old ... so I guess they don't count.

Give me a break ... I am a lowly schmuck that plays with computers for a living and I can figure this out ... why is nobody asking the obvious questions?

"Can you use these in artillery?" No, you liberal jackass ... that's exactly why we were worried about them. If they were no longer useful to Saddam, what the hell did you think he was going to do with them? or more specifically, their ingredients?

That was the whole point ... war on terrorists, remember? The terrorists that were wearing a path through Iraq (oh, yeah ... that's right ... they were in the "lawless" region where Saddam had no control ... sure, right). So Saddam is cash strapped (with the exception of all the money in his bribes), chemical rich ... and he's got terrorists beating down the door to his house.

If they were not useful ... why did Saddam hide them instead of destroying them? If he would have handed us the pieces of these things (hell, he could have even given the chemicals out and told us he dumped them) and the libs / UN would have swooned over him ... and he would still be in power. And his terrorist pals would be buzzing around the world delivering the poison. But instead he went down clinging to his "useless" weapons ... yeah, right.

When something doesn't make any sense ... perhaps the obvious is true.